![]() |
| Guy Gillette (The Courier. May 29, 1924) |
He didn’t trust party machines. He didn’t trust
Wall Street. He especially didn’t trust men who spoke softly while reaching for
control.
Washington wanted obedience. Gillette offered
scrutiny.
He backed farm relief because Iowa was starving.
He backed soil conservation because the land was breaking. He backed rural
electrification because darkness still ruled whole counties. Those votes earned
him enemies in corporate boardrooms and quiet allies in farm kitchens.
The real fight came during World War II.
The Senate was flooded with emergency bills. Weapons contracts. War industries. Spending without ceilings. Gillette voted for the war, but he fought the money behind it. He questioned contractors, challenged cost overruns, and warned that corporations were growing fat while soldiers bled. As he told the Senate not long after America entered the conflict, “We said that they went over there … not to prove the prowess of America … but to see to it that there never was such a war again.”
That made him dangerous.
Business interests moved against him almost immediately. Lobbyists targeted him as “unreliable.” Party leaders tagged him as “difficult.” He refused to soften.
He opposed the peacetime draft before Pearl Harbor, questioned intelligence failures after, and supported the troops but never surrendered oversight. In wartime Washington, that made him radioactive.
Radio attacks followed. Newspapers turned hostile. Money poured into Iowa to destroy him.
In 1944, they got their opening.
The war was popular. The administration demanded unity. Gillette ran for reelection against a well-funded Republican challenger with quiet backing from business interests and party operatives who wanted him gone. The campaign was brutal. He was painted as disloyal. Obstructionist. Soft on the war.
He lost. The message was clear: independence would not be tolerated.
Gillette did not retreat into silence. He returned to Iowa, and in 1949 he came back into power another way—on the Iowa Supreme Court. For four years, he dismantled weak arguments with calm precision. No favors. No noise.

No comments:
Post a Comment