Clinton’s $20 Million Data Center Deal: Gift, Bribe, or Just Business?

 

Twenty million dollars.

That’s the number getting everyone’s attention in Clinton.

A company wants to explore building a massive data center outside of town. In the middle of all the talk about electricity, farmland, noise, and water comes the sweetener: $20 million for a new athletic complex.

Basketball courts. Ball fields. Exercise facilities. Community rooms.

Clinton has talked about this project since 2017.

Just a few months ago, city leaders were discussing a $10 million to $16 million facility. Mayor Scott Maddasion said taxpayers might have to vote on a referendum to help pay for it.

Then QTS entered the picture. Suddenly, Clinton wasn’t talking about asking taxpayers for the money. Someone else might write the check.

Sounds pretty good. Maybe too good. Because companies don’t hand cities $20 million for the fun of it. QTS isn’t sitting around worrying about where Clinton kids are going to play basketball next winter.

They want something. The question is what?

Some Clinton residents are calling the $20 million a bribe. That’s a loaded word. Legally, there’s no evidence it’s a bribe. But you can understand why people say it.

Imagine your neighbor wants to build a giant factory next to your house. You complain about the noise, traffic, and what it might do to your property value. Then he says, “By the way, I’ll build the neighborhood a new swimming pool.” You might really want the pool. But you’d probably ask a few more questions before grabbing your swimsuit.

That’s where Clinton is right now.

QTS is looking at land north of Highway 30 and west of Mill Creek Parkway. They describe it as a multibillion-dollar data center campus. And QTS isn’t a guy from Davenport looking to open a warehouse. It’s a global data center company backed by Blackstone, one of the biggest investment firms in the world.

The proposed QTS data center is still in the early stages. The city hasn’t signed off on a finished site plan or a complete incentive package.

Clinton residents have already packed City Hall to talk about this. In June, the City Council rejected a temporary moratorium on data centers.

That vote didn’t approve the QTS project, a site plan, tax incentives, or a development agreement.

Clinton isn’t the first Iowa city to hear this pitch. Data centers are already a reality in Cedar Rapids, West Des Moines, and Altoona.

The companies and deals are different. But the basic sales pitch is familiar. We’ll invest billions, create construction jobs, add to the tax base, and be a good neighbor.

So, how did that work out?

Clinton may get a $20 million payment toward a new athletic and community complex. That’s the shiny part of the deal.

What we don’t know yet is more important. How much electricity will the full campus need? Who pays for new power lines, substations, and other equipment? What tax breaks will QTS receive? How many permanent jobs will be guaranteed? And what happens to nearby homeowners if noise becomes a problem?

These aren’t concerns dreamed up by angry people on Facebook.

Clinton’s own proposed data center ordinance is expected to address water, utilities, noise, lighting, setbacks, traffic, stormwater, emergency response, environmental compliance, and even what happens when a data center shuts down.

That’s a pretty long list for something we’re being told not to worry about.

QTS has said the proposed Clinton facility would use a closed-loop cooling system that doesn’t consume water during normal operation. That’s different from some older data centers.

Put it in writing.

That’s the lesson Clinton should take from other Iowa cities. Promises are nice. Contracts are better.

In Cedar Rapids, QTS agreed to put up to $18 million into a city-owned Community Betterment Fund over twenty years. That’s real money. It can pay for city projects and help nonprofit groups.

Now look at the other side of the deal.

Cedar Rapids estimates the first two phases could generate about $1 billion in property taxes over the rebate periods. Under the deal, an estimated $529 million goes back to QTS through tax rebates. QTS also puts up to $18 million into the city’s Community Betterment Fund.

That’s the part Clinton needs to study.

The $18 million sounds enormous when you say it by itself. It sounds different when you lay the entire deal on the kitchen table.

It’s like buying a truck and bragging that the dealer threw in a $500 snowplow. Great. Now tell me what the truck cost.

Cedar Rapids called QTS the largest economic development investment in the city’s history. The announced minimum investment was $750 million.

The first two phases guaranteed 30 full-time high-tech jobs. That’s why Clinton needs to be careful when politicians and developers talk about “jobs.” Construction jobs and permanent jobs aren’t the same thing. Building Walmart takes a lot of workers. That doesn’t mean the carpenters keep showing up after the grand opening.

West Des Moines took a different approach with Microsoft.

Microsoft has invested billions of dollars in data centers there. The city says its agreements used Microsoft’s property taxes to help pay for roads, sewer lines, and water infrastructure needed for the projects.

The city tied the new development to the cost of serving it. That’s a pretty simple idea to understand.

If you invite fifty people to dinner, you don’t ask Grandma to pay for all the food because she was already sitting at the table. The fifty new guests are the reason you need more food.

Data centers can create the same problems with electricity, water, and roads. If a new business requires an enormous investment in infrastructure, Clinton residents deserve to know who foots the bill.

West Des Moines learned another lesson.

Water matters.

Microsoft’s five data center campuses used 68.5 million gallons of water in 2024, about 2.6 percent of the city’s total water use.

The data centers didn’t cause Central Iowa’s 2025 watering ban. Water officials blamed high nitrate levels that strained the regional treatment system. Still, West Des Moines paid attention.

City leaders said future data center projects would need to reduce peak water use. Microsoft’s next data center buildings are expected to use new “zero-water” cooling technology.

See how that works?

A city sees a problem. It pushes back, and the company changes the technology.

That’s called negotiating.

Then there’s Altoona. Meta started building its data center campus there in 2013.

The city made a big bet, agreeing to waive normal property taxes for twenty years. Instead, Meta agreed to pay about $3 per square foot each year. The payment was estimated at roughly $3 million a year.

The deal was still a discount. Reports at the time estimated Meta would pay about 60 percent of what it might have paid under normal property taxes.

Why would Altoona agree to that?

Meta kept building. By 2021, the Altoona campus was growing past five million square feet. That’s not a building. That’s a small city wearing a company badge.

The Altoona campus represented more than $2.5 billion in investment. Over 400 people worked in data center operations on the site each day, and construction kept an average of about 1,000 workers busy for years.

That’s different from a small data center promising thirty jobs. Altoona gave something up. But it got something big enough to change the local economy. Whether the deal was worth it is still open to debate.

So, what is Clinton getting? That’s the question I keep coming back to.

Cedar Rapids got a community betterment fund. West Des Moines got billions in investment and used property tax revenue to help build infrastructure. Altoona got a massive campus that kept expanding for more than a decade.

Clinton may get a $20 million athletic complex.

Is that enough?

If QTS builds a billion-dollar or multibillion-dollar campus here, $20 million may sound a lot bigger to us than it does to them. For a family earning $50,000 a year, twenty bucks isn’t life-changing money. For a kid with five dollars in his pocket, twenty bucks looks like a fortune.

Clinton needs to make sure we’re looking at this deal like a city negotiating with a billion-dollar company. Not like a kid staring at a twenty-dollar bill.

What Clinton should tell itself is this: We don’t need to chase QTS out of town. But we also don’t need to roll out the red carpet before we know where it leads.

How much power will the completed campus use? Who pays for the electrical upgrades? What tax breaks will QTS receive from Clinton and the State of Iowa? How many permanent jobs are guaranteed? What happens if the noise is louder than promised? Is the closed-loop water system guaranteed in the final agreement? Will QTS pay for infrastructure built mainly to serve its campus?

And here’s the big one: What did QTS give other cities that Clinton hasn’t asked for yet?

That’s not being anti-business. If you buy a used truck, you look under the hood. You ask what the other guy paid. You check the tires.

You don’t hand over your money because the salesperson promised to throw in a free hat.

The $20 million athletic complex may be a great deal for Clinton. But right now, it’s the free hat.

Before we get too excited, we should find out what we’re paying for the truck.

Before you go ...

If you’ve ever said, “I remember that place”… this blog is for you.

I dig up the stories, the lost stores, the old Iowa you don’t see anymore. No clickbait. No junk. Just real nostalgia.

 

If you enjoy it, consider tossing a few bucks in the donation slot. It helps keep this thing going.

Buy me a Big Gulp / Support Retro Iowa